It looks as if the axis of evil is actually more civilized than our childish dictator.
Iran intercepted and took into custody fifteen trespassers. I know, it sounds like they did a bad, bad thing. However, if you look at what we have done to their neighbor, would you blame them for being cautious?
Iranian state television said the 14 men and one woman, who were seized while on patrol in the northern Persian gulf on March 23, would leave Iran on Thursday. An Iranian official in London said they would be handed over to British diplomats in Tehran.
Ahmadinejad's surprise announcement came at a news conference shortly after he pinned a medal on the chest of the Iranian coast guard commander who intercepted the sailors and marines.
The Iranians did not hold these people in secret prisons, did not torture them. The kept them safe and well and are releasing them. I could get rather sarcastic here, but I won't. I just hope that every American out there learns a lesson from this. We are not as great and moral and civilized as we pretend to be.
Wednesday, April 4, 2007
Monday, April 2, 2007
George Bush
Neil Young and I would like to extend a big welcome to Katrinacrat. This ones for you! Enjoy!
The SOB is at it Again!
I wrote this back in January, before my little blog was a month old. I haven't heard anything much about it since. That is, until now.
Sad as it may seem, I did not find this on a U.S. television station, nor did I find it on a U.S. web site (CNN, Fox...) I found it at the BBC, a Canadian news web site. I hit that often, I'm a hockey fan living in Arizona. If it doesn't concern the Coyotes... anyway, off track there for a minute....
Has anyone heard this yet?
State department spokesman Sean McCormack rejected suggestions that a swap could be made.
The five, believed to be members of Iran's Revolutionary Guard, were seized in January in the Iraqi city of Irbil.
Britain denies Iran's claims that the UK crew was in its waters when seized on 23 March.
The five Iranians were captured in a raid along with equipment which the Americans say shows clear Iranian links to networks supplying Iraqi insurgents with technology and weapons.
US officials have condemned Iran's actions and publicly supported the UK.
Let me see if I have this right. We went into an Iranian consulate on Iraqi soil and pulled out five Iranians and are holding them somewhere? We are also, refusing to let them go? We are refusing to exchange them for the lives of fifteen British ... well Grunts. They are not officers, they are the people who put their lives on the line for oil.... I mean Iraqi freedom... or is it our liberties this week? Oh hell! I can't keep up!
Okay shrub, I get it. You are orchestrating another war by pointing and blaming and lying (again). I get it. Now, you get this. NO! Nope, we the people have had enough. Our troops are tired. Many are on tour numbers three and four. They miss their families and they miss sleeping without fear. The Iraqi's miss their home and their way of life. We will not allow you to lead us into another lie, another war. No way in fucking hell! Can we impeach these bastards now? Please?
Sad as it may seem, I did not find this on a U.S. television station, nor did I find it on a U.S. web site (CNN, Fox...) I found it at the BBC, a Canadian news web site. I hit that often, I'm a hockey fan living in Arizona. If it doesn't concern the Coyotes... anyway, off track there for a minute....
Has anyone heard this yet?
State department spokesman Sean McCormack rejected suggestions that a swap could be made.
The five, believed to be members of Iran's Revolutionary Guard, were seized in January in the Iraqi city of Irbil.
Britain denies Iran's claims that the UK crew was in its waters when seized on 23 March.
The five Iranians were captured in a raid along with equipment which the Americans say shows clear Iranian links to networks supplying Iraqi insurgents with technology and weapons.
US officials have condemned Iran's actions and publicly supported the UK.
Let me see if I have this right. We went into an Iranian consulate on Iraqi soil and pulled out five Iranians and are holding them somewhere? We are also, refusing to let them go? We are refusing to exchange them for the lives of fifteen British ... well Grunts. They are not officers, they are the people who put their lives on the line for oil.... I mean Iraqi freedom... or is it our liberties this week? Oh hell! I can't keep up!
Okay shrub, I get it. You are orchestrating another war by pointing and blaming and lying (again). I get it. Now, you get this. NO! Nope, we the people have had enough. Our troops are tired. Many are on tour numbers three and four. They miss their families and they miss sleeping without fear. The Iraqi's miss their home and their way of life. We will not allow you to lead us into another lie, another war. No way in fucking hell! Can we impeach these bastards now? Please?
Reid Says, "Screw You!"
"It's time the self-appointed strategists on Capitol Hill understood a very simple concept: You cannot win a war if you tell the enemy you're going to quit," Vice President Dick Cheney said Monday at fundraising luncheon for Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala.
Well Dick, we are about to win the war with you, and we're even telling you when.
Yes, dear readers and fellow bloggers, the great house has spoken. It proclaimed loudly, "Veto this jackass!"
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Monday he wants to cut off money for the Iraq war next year, making clear for the first time that Democrats are willing to pull out all the stops to end U.S. involvement.
(snip)
"In the face of the administration's stubborn unwillingness to change course, the Senate has no choice but to force a change of course," said Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., who signed on Monday as a co-sponsor of Reid's proposal with Sen. Russ Feingold (news, bio, voting record), D-Wis.
(snip)
Reid has previously stopped short of embracing Feingold's position. When asked whether he would ever consider pulling funds for the troops, Reid said Congress would provide troops what they needed to be safe.
Reid's latest proposal would give the president one year to get troops out, ending funding for combat operations after March 31,2008.
"If the president vetoes the supplemental appropriations bill and continues to resist changing course in Iraq, I will work to ensure this legislation receives a vote in the Senate in the next work period," Reid said in a statement.(snip)
"It appears they're still content to work on a bill that does not have serious plans to fund troops or make Iraq, America and the world more secure, but rather attempts at forcing us into giving up in Iraq without regard to the consequences of failure," said White House spokeswoman Dana Perino.
(snip)
Reid's proposal is unlikely to pass. But Democrats say they believe with each passing week — as the violence in Iraq continues and voters grow increasingly tired of the war — they pick up additional support.
The Senate last week passed its anti-war proposal by a 50-48 vote after winning support from Sens. Chuck Hagel (news, bio, voting record), R-Neb., and Ben Nelson (news, bio, voting record), D-Neb., who just two weeks prior had opposed a similar measure.
Reid spokesman Jim Manley said if legislation to cut off funding for the war fails, Reid will try again with the hopes of getting new supporters. "It is the next in a series of steps to try to ratchet up the pressure to try to get the administration to change its policies," he said.
The bill to cut off funds for the war would likely be introduced as standalone legislation and would not be tied to the supplemental spending bill, Manley said.
Ah yes, the sweet sound of the purse strings, the blank check, the bowing to the king, having the door slammed in it's face. This may be a long battle but it seems as if the good guys are up for the it. It's a good day for democracy. It's a good day for the troops these idiots set up to fail. It's a good day for the Iraqi's. And the good days have just begun.
Well Dick, we are about to win the war with you, and we're even telling you when.
Yes, dear readers and fellow bloggers, the great house has spoken. It proclaimed loudly, "Veto this jackass!"
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Monday he wants to cut off money for the Iraq war next year, making clear for the first time that Democrats are willing to pull out all the stops to end U.S. involvement.
(snip)
"In the face of the administration's stubborn unwillingness to change course, the Senate has no choice but to force a change of course," said Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., who signed on Monday as a co-sponsor of Reid's proposal with Sen. Russ Feingold (news, bio, voting record), D-Wis.
(snip)
Reid has previously stopped short of embracing Feingold's position. When asked whether he would ever consider pulling funds for the troops, Reid said Congress would provide troops what they needed to be safe.
Reid's latest proposal would give the president one year to get troops out, ending funding for combat operations after March 31,2008.
"If the president vetoes the supplemental appropriations bill and continues to resist changing course in Iraq, I will work to ensure this legislation receives a vote in the Senate in the next work period," Reid said in a statement.(snip)
"It appears they're still content to work on a bill that does not have serious plans to fund troops or make Iraq, America and the world more secure, but rather attempts at forcing us into giving up in Iraq without regard to the consequences of failure," said White House spokeswoman Dana Perino.
(snip)
Reid's proposal is unlikely to pass. But Democrats say they believe with each passing week — as the violence in Iraq continues and voters grow increasingly tired of the war — they pick up additional support.
The Senate last week passed its anti-war proposal by a 50-48 vote after winning support from Sens. Chuck Hagel (news, bio, voting record), R-Neb., and Ben Nelson (news, bio, voting record), D-Neb., who just two weeks prior had opposed a similar measure.
Reid spokesman Jim Manley said if legislation to cut off funding for the war fails, Reid will try again with the hopes of getting new supporters. "It is the next in a series of steps to try to ratchet up the pressure to try to get the administration to change its policies," he said.
The bill to cut off funds for the war would likely be introduced as standalone legislation and would not be tied to the supplemental spending bill, Manley said.
Ah yes, the sweet sound of the purse strings, the blank check, the bowing to the king, having the door slammed in it's face. This may be a long battle but it seems as if the good guys are up for the it. It's a good day for democracy. It's a good day for the troops these idiots set up to fail. It's a good day for the Iraqi's. And the good days have just begun.
We, the People
I am not sure what's wrong with the Iranians. Don't they know we are a civilized nation and will not stand for mistreatment, let alone holding prisoners against their will? Making that poor woman wear a black scarf over her head, how dare they! We would never do or even think about such things! Or.. would we?
A British resident released from Guantanamo Bay after being held for more than four years has said that the US failed to observe fair legal processes at the detention camp.
Bisher al-Rawi, an Iraqi national and British resident, had been held at the US military base in Cuba since 2002, but was reunited with his family this weekend in England.
"Allegations are made against you that are laughably untrue, but you have no chance to prove them wrong. There is no trial, no fair legal process," al-Rawi said in a statement on Sunday.
(snip)
"[Al-Rawi] has been held in Guantanamo Bay in total isolation – lights on, 24 hours a day, in a six-foot by eight-foot cell," he said.
Al-Rawi said in his statement issued through Reprieve that he wanted to advocate for the remaining British citizens held in Guantanamo Bay.
"I hope everyone who believes in justice and the rule of law will join with me to work for the release of Jamil and the other British residents," he said.
Britain has secured the release of all nine of its citizens who were held at Guantanamo but says the release of nine others who were resident in Britain but not nationals is not it's responsibility.
Responsabitity. Now, there's a word bushco doesn't understand. Accountability is another.
The Supreme Court rejected an appeal Monday from Guantanamo detainees who want challenge their five-year-long confinement in court, a victory for the Bush administration’s legal strategy in its fight against terrorism.
A victory? Fight against terrorism?
A federal appeals court in Washington in February upheld a key provision of a law enacted last year that strips federal courts of their ability to hear such challenges.
At issue is whether prisoners held at Guantanamo have a right to habeas corpus review, a basic tenet of the Constitution that protects people from unlawful imprisonment.
We demand the Iranians release the fifteen prisoners they have. Yet, we do not. Some at Gitmo have been held for five years.
We call the Iranians terrorists. Yet it is we who terrorize nations.
We celebrated the hanging of Saddam. Yet bush & co. has more blood on their hands than Saddam did.
We wave a flag and swear to God. Yet, we advocate torture. We murder, we lie, we judge, we hate. We allow spying on American citizens without just cause, without warrants. We do not care about others less fortunate, if it means using our money to care, yet we have no objection to using billions of our future children's tax dollars to murder in the middle east.
We are 28% of a country. We are the last remaining sheep of the bush administration. We care not. We are afraid. We are told to be afraid, therefore we are. We are told people want to kill us. Therefore they do. We do not bother to look back at the days leading up to 9/11. We place blame on the Clinton administration, because we are told to. We do not learn from past leaders mistakes and knowledge. We are afraid. We are civilized.
A British resident released from Guantanamo Bay after being held for more than four years has said that the US failed to observe fair legal processes at the detention camp.
Bisher al-Rawi, an Iraqi national and British resident, had been held at the US military base in Cuba since 2002, but was reunited with his family this weekend in England.
"Allegations are made against you that are laughably untrue, but you have no chance to prove them wrong. There is no trial, no fair legal process," al-Rawi said in a statement on Sunday.
(snip)
"[Al-Rawi] has been held in Guantanamo Bay in total isolation – lights on, 24 hours a day, in a six-foot by eight-foot cell," he said.
Al-Rawi said in his statement issued through Reprieve that he wanted to advocate for the remaining British citizens held in Guantanamo Bay.
"I hope everyone who believes in justice and the rule of law will join with me to work for the release of Jamil and the other British residents," he said.
Britain has secured the release of all nine of its citizens who were held at Guantanamo but says the release of nine others who were resident in Britain but not nationals is not it's responsibility.
Responsabitity. Now, there's a word bushco doesn't understand. Accountability is another.
The Supreme Court rejected an appeal Monday from Guantanamo detainees who want challenge their five-year-long confinement in court, a victory for the Bush administration’s legal strategy in its fight against terrorism.
A victory? Fight against terrorism?
A federal appeals court in Washington in February upheld a key provision of a law enacted last year that strips federal courts of their ability to hear such challenges.
At issue is whether prisoners held at Guantanamo have a right to habeas corpus review, a basic tenet of the Constitution that protects people from unlawful imprisonment.
We demand the Iranians release the fifteen prisoners they have. Yet, we do not. Some at Gitmo have been held for five years.
We call the Iranians terrorists. Yet it is we who terrorize nations.
We celebrated the hanging of Saddam. Yet bush & co. has more blood on their hands than Saddam did.
We wave a flag and swear to God. Yet, we advocate torture. We murder, we lie, we judge, we hate. We allow spying on American citizens without just cause, without warrants. We do not care about others less fortunate, if it means using our money to care, yet we have no objection to using billions of our future children's tax dollars to murder in the middle east.
We are 28% of a country. We are the last remaining sheep of the bush administration. We care not. We are afraid. We are told to be afraid, therefore we are. We are told people want to kill us. Therefore they do. We do not bother to look back at the days leading up to 9/11. We place blame on the Clinton administration, because we are told to. We do not learn from past leaders mistakes and knowledge. We are afraid. We are civilized.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
